<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital Juries · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.06393/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.06393/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital Juries — mentioned by rektide</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34583887</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2202.06393:34583887</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:09:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, well, Google &amp;amp; all sites also has a right to defend the network against attackers, which these people constitute. They actively degraded the site&amp;#x27;s quality &amp;amp; looked like &amp;amp; were an attack. Ultimately I think it&amp;#x27;s the right of these sites to handle matters as they may, and to a large degree caveat emptor us users. But I also very much want there to be forgiveness somewhere in these systems. The historical, classic, &amp;quot;It was just a joke&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#x27;t cut it, but I also am not heartless, don&amp;#x27;t think the punishment here ought to be forever. I want there to be reconciliation, reform, appeals…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.06393/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item></channel></rss>
