<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MV-Datalog+-: Effective Rule-based Reasoning with Uncertain Observations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01718/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01718/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>MV-Datalog+-: Effective Rule-based Reasoning with Uncertain Observations — mentioned by alexisread</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37203634</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2202.01718:37203634</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:43:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess you get a combinatorial explosion for binary operators: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-valued_logic That&amp;#x27;s not to say that you can&amp;#x27;t get some value out of it. SQL is probably the closest language currently to implement TVL, and there have been recent works on datalog as well: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.01718.pdf Datalog has generally better defined reasoning than SQL, and can kinda serve duty for typechecking, formal verification. It&amp;#x27;s worth noting that many languages have the (disjointed) concept of uninitialised values which are equivalent to TVL (Also note nullable types in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01718/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
