<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generative Flow Networks for Discrete Probabilistic Modeling · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01361/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01361/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generative Flow Networks for Discrete Probabilistic Modeling — mentioned by manux</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30591938</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2202.01361:30591938</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 19:05:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, although they may not be ideal unless you&amp;#x27;re able to define a &amp;quot;distance&amp;quot; between a proof that the agent is proposing and whether that proof is correct (i.e. unless you&amp;#x27;re able to define a reward or energy function). It may be possible to infer/learn a score from existing proofs though. We have a paper that manages to both learn a flow and an energy function (the score) from data: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01361 I don&amp;#x27;t know much about theorem proving though. Can some value be attributed to partial proofs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2202.01361/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
