<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On Stevenhagen's conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.13424/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.13424/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On Stevenhagen's conjecture — mentioned by svat</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32416534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2201.13424:32416534</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:34:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Right, this is about the negative Pell&amp;#x27;s equation, x^2 - dy^2 = -1 (rather than +1). The question is for which d this has a solution. (For the usual +1 case, which is what you&amp;#x27;re talking about, there are solutions for every d, and indeed continued fractions can be used.) There are no solutions when d has any factor that is 3 mod 4, and the result mentioned in the article (Stevenhagen&amp;#x27;s conjecture, now proved by Koymans and Pagano) is that there are solutions for about 58% of the rest, specifically 1 - product_{j odd}(1 - 1/2^j) ≈ 0.580577558…. The first couple of pages of the paper (linked…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.13424/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
