HackerPapers

arXiv:2201.10816cs.PL

Fifty Years of Prolog and Beyond

Philipp Körner, Michael Leuschel, João Barbosa, Vítor Santos Costa, Verónica Dahl, Manuel V. Hermenegildo, Jose F. Morales, Jan Wielemaker, Daniel Diaz, Salvador Abreu, Giovanni Ciatto

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Both logic programming in general, and Prolog in particular, have a long and fascinating history, intermingled with that of many disciplines they inherited from or catalyzed. A large body of research has been gathered over the last 50 years, supported by many Prolog implementations. Many implementations are still actively developed, while new ones keep appearing. Often, the features added by different systems were motivated by the interdisciplinary needs of programmers and implementors, yielding systems that, while sharing the "classic" core language, and, in particular, the main aspects of the ISO-Prolog standard, also depart from each other in other aspects. This obviously poses challenges for code portability. The field has also inspired many related, but quite different languages that have created their own communities. This article aims at integrating and applying the main lessons learned in the process of evolution of Prolog. It is structured into three major parts. Firstly, we overview the evolution of Prolog systems and the community approximately up to the ISO standard, considering both the main historic developments and the motivations behind several Prolog implementations, as well as other logic programming languages influenced by Prolog. Then, we discuss the Prolog implementations that are most active after the appearance of the standard: their visions, goals, commonalities, and incompatibilities. Finally, we perform a SWOT analysis in order to better identify the potential of Prolog, and propose future directions along which Prolog might continue to add useful features, interfaces, libraries, and tools, while at the same time improving compatibility between implementations.

arXiv comments
87 pages, 2 figures. This article has been accepted for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.PLProgramming Languages

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2022 to Sep 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Jan 2022 to Jan 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • And via your link, here's a handy 87 page survey article on arXiv, "50 Years of Prolog and Beyond": https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10816

      stevesimmonsView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.