<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.07845/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.07845/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development — mentioned by Mathnerd314</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33513514</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2201.07845:33513514</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 22:35:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For more, see https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/kps2015/proceedings/KPS_20... (clearly distinguishing C* which corresponds to the hardware from &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; which is the subset of C* that excludes all undefined behaviour) and https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.07845.pdf &amp;quot;How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.07845/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.OS</category></item><item><title>How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development — mentioned by aw1621107</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30460980</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2201.07845:30460980</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 22:10:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; but there was an article on here not too long ago that was arguing that nearly all os development required old C because choices of the committee would break use cases required under the guise of undefined behavior. I would guess that you&amp;#x27;re referring to either &amp;quot;How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development&amp;quot; ([0]) or &amp;quot;How One Word Broke C&amp;quot; ([1]). [0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07845 , most recent HN discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30022022 [1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20210307213745/https://news.quel... , HN discussion at…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.07845/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.OS</category></item><item><title>How ISO C became unusable for operating systems development — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30022022</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2201.07845:30022022</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:20:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;ISO C became unusable for operating systems development&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;203 points; 475 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.07845/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.OS</category></item></channel></rss>
