<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>De-rendering 3D Objects in the Wild · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.02279/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.02279/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>De-rendering 3D Objects in the Wild — mentioned by cthalupa</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39521270</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2201.02279:39521270</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:45:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; But the other side doesn&amp;#x27;t see it that way, specifically not the &amp;quot;something more&amp;quot; part. It&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;just math&amp;quot; all the way down, in our brains as well. The &amp;quot;emergent phenomena&amp;quot; are not undefined in this sense - they&amp;#x27;re (obviously in LLMs) also math, it&amp;#x27;s just that we don&amp;#x27;t understand it yet due to the sheer complexity of the resulting system. But that&amp;#x27;s not at all unusual - humans build useful things that we don&amp;#x27;t fully understand all the time (just look at physics of various processes). You might not, but you don&amp;#x27;t have to look far in these very comments to be met with woo and mysticism on the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.02279/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
