<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lock-Free Locks Revisited · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.00813/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.00813/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Lock-Free Locks Revisited — mentioned by senderista</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38017758</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2201.00813:38017758</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 20:17:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very tenuously related, but the idea of logging all nondeterministic effects for idempotence can also be used to make locks lock-free! https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00813&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.00813/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item><item><title>Lock-Free Locks Revisited — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30096822</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2201.00813:30096822</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:11:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Lock-Free Locks Revisited&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;49 points; 11 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2201.00813/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
