<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Learning Implicit Body Representations from Double Diffusion Based Neural Radiance Fields · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.12390/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.12390/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Learning Implicit Body Representations from Double Diffusion Based Neural Radiance Fields — mentioned by zone411</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32680478</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.12390:32680478</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:02:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Stable Diffusion was trained primarily on LAION-Aesthetics, a collection of subsets of the LAION 5B dataset, which is itself a subset of LAION-400M&amp;quot; Err, no? As you can tell by the name itself, the 5B dataset is larger. &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Unlike autoencoder-based deepfake content, or the human recreations that can be achieved by Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), diffusion-based systems learn to generate images by adding noise&amp;quot; This is confused. Diffusion is orthogonal to NeRF. For example, here is a paper that uses both: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12390 &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Within…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.12390/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
