<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pulsational pair-instability supernovae: gravitational collapse, black-hole formation, and beyond · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.09707/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.09707/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pulsational pair-instability supernovae: gravitational collapse, black-hole formation, and beyond — mentioned by pangeorg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38652672</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.09707:38652672</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:05:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Astrophysicist here :) You are correct in some way to say that the star &amp;quot;squeezes&amp;quot; the core. During the evolution of massive stars, say stars roughly 8 times as massive as our sun, the core grows to a point where it just cannot support itself. It collapses and in consequence triggers the type 2 supernova. Another commenter already mentioned correctly that the remnant of the explosion is typically a neutron star or a black hole. The asymmetries seen in the gaseous remnant are caused by the explosion, which typically is highly asymmetric for stars of larger mass…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.09707/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
