<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the variational method for Euclidean quantum fields in infinite volume · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.05562/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.05562/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the variational method for Euclidean quantum fields in infinite volume — mentioned by mgubi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34183541</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.05562:34183541</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:47:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It is not clear what this comment would like to add. The presupposition that no other software can equal or surpass some magic powers of TeX/LaTeX has nothing to do with technical merit. Indeed I guess most users cannot distinguish a document produced with TeXmacs or with LaTeX. For example all these papers: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.05584.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.05562.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.15047.pdf have been typesetted directly with TeXmacs with no intervention of LaTeX whatsoever. What use cases do you have in mind to support your claim? ps: it is clear that TeX is a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.05562/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.PR</category></item><item><title>On the variational method for Euclidean quantum fields in infinite volume — mentioned by mgubi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31501102</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.05562:31501102</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 06:03:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I write all my papers with it since few years, and my lecture notes, and my talks. The papers are converted to LaTeX when sending to the publisher. Several of my PhD students used it to write their thesis. Also some Master students. Some pointers here: Papers: - https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09637 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05562 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12115 Lecture notes: - https://www.iam.uni-bonn.de/abteilung-gubinelli/teaching/sto... Online lectures with TeXmacs: - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL50D2PpswE&amp;amp;t=4990s&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.05562/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.PR</category></item></channel></rss>
