<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On a density conjecture about unit fractions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.03726/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.03726/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On a density conjecture about unit fractions — mentioned by mauricioc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30619577</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.03726:30619577</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 20:30:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The quoted sentence is an informal description of &amp;quot;positive density&amp;quot;, and you can find the definition of density at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_density, or you can take a look at the first page of the source material at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.03726.pdf. In fact, the theorem proved works for a stronger notion called &amp;quot;positive upper density&amp;quot;; the definition of &amp;quot;upper density&amp;quot; is also in the linked Wikipedia page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.03726/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
