HackerPapers

arXiv:2112.03233quant-ph

Fundamental trade-off relation in probabilistic entanglement generation

Yuanbo Chen, Yoshihiko Hasegawa

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We investigate the generation of entanglement between two non-interacting systems by synthesizing a new quantum process from the superposition of distinct processes characterized by local-only operations. Our analysis leads to the derivation of a universal trade-off relation, $P_{\text{succ}}(1+\mathcal{C})\le1$, that fundamentally bounds the success probability ($P_{\text{succ}}$) and the generated entanglement (concurrence $\mathcal{C}$). The derivation of this trade-off relation is inspired by indefinite causal order, but applies for a broader class of quantum processes. Next, we show that the mathematical structure of this bound predicts the existence of a "quasi-deterministic" mode of operation, a surprising phenomenon which we then confirm with concrete entanglement generation protocols, where a maximally entangled state is guaranteed to be produced. In this mode of operation, both outcomes of the post-selection measurement on the auxiliary control system result in a maximally entangled state of the target system. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this general principle can be realized using a quantum switch, which leverages an indefinite causal order as a physical resource, and explore the rich variety of dynamical behaviors governed by the universal trade-off. Our results establish a general principle for entanglement generation with superposition of quantum processes and introduce a novel way of controlling entanglement generation.

arXiv comments
22 Pages, 7 Figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2023 to Dec 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I don't see the paper on arXiv (which is very very odd for a quantum mechanics paper), but PRL is usually legit. I don't seem to get to read PRL papers for free, though :(. In an effort to figure out what the authors are talking about, I found this earlier paper…

      amlutoView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.