<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Efficient FPGA-based ECDSA Verification Engine for Permissioned Blockchains · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.02229/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.02229/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Efficient FPGA-based ECDSA Verification Engine for Permissioned Blockchains — mentioned by posnet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39977987</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.02229:39977987</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:30:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just for fun, because it&amp;#x27;s hard to appreciate how strong a 256bit ECDSA key is. Base Numbers: - 2*128 guesses on average - public state of the art for ECDSA on an FPGA is 1315tps [0] - retail price of said fpga $10,000 [1] - total net income for xilinx from advanced FPGAs FY2022 (936M * 0.74 + 879M * 0.72) = 1325M [2] Ballpark numbers, we&amp;#x27;ll assume that attacker can buy 10x every FPGA xilinx made in 2022 for a 50% discount and can run them non stop for zero cost. We&amp;#x27;ll also assume they have a bunch of secret math geniuses and have a faster ECDSA implementation that can do 1,000,000,000 tps…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.02229/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
