<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Limitations of Linear Cross-Entropy as a Measure for Quantum Advantage · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.01657/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.01657/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Limitations of Linear Cross-Entropy as a Measure for Quantum Advantage — mentioned by machina_ex_deus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33822505</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2112.01657:33822505</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:49:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They should go back to the drawing board and actually get a stronger argument they really have a quantum computer. For those not following https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=6645, their quantum supremacy experiments used quite a bad metric that&amp;#x27;s very easily spoofable. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01657 Quantum computer is the perpetual motion machine of the 21st century. I&amp;#x27;m sure we&amp;#x27;ll never get there, but getting an insight like the second law of thermodynamics of why it&amp;#x27;s impossible will be important too. And I don&amp;#x27;t buy the attitude of &amp;quot;the errors will be bad&amp;quot;, that&amp;#x27;s like &amp;quot;there is always…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2112.01657/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
