<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Conditional Image Generation with Score-Based Diffusion Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.13606/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.13606/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Conditional Image Generation with Score-Based Diffusion Models — mentioned by SleekEagle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31361142</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2111.13606:31361142</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 23:03:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In this formulation, no, you have no control over the output other than the fact that it is similar to your training data. If you need to have control over the generated image, you would need to use a conditional diffusion model. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.13606.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.13606/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
