<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Survey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.07624/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.07624/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Survey — mentioned by D-Machine</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46536539</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2111.07624:46536539</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 02:43:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The main takeaway is that &amp;quot;attention&amp;quot; is a much broader concept generally, so worrying too much about the &amp;quot;scaled dot-product attention&amp;quot; of transformers deeply limits your understanding of what kinds of things really matter in general. A paper I found particularly useful on this was generalizing even farther to note the importance of multiplicative interactions more generally in deep learning (https://openreview.net/pdf?id=rylnK6VtDH). EDIT: Also, this paper I was looking for dramatically generalizes the notion of attention in a way I found to be quite helpful: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.07624&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.07624/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Survey — mentioned by D-Machine</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46536472</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2111.07624:46536472</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 02:34:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#x27;t get caught up in interpreting QKV, it is a waste of time, since completely different attention formulations (e.g. merged attention [1]) still give you the similarities / multiplicative interactions, but may even work better [2]. EDIT: Oh and attention is much more broad than scaled dot-product attention [3]. [1] https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/merged-attention [2] https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-... [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07624&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2111.07624/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
