HackerPapers

arXiv:2111.04949cs.LG

A Survey and Empirical Evaluation of Parallel Deep Learning Frameworks

Daniel Nichols, Siddharth Singh, Shu-Huai Lin, Abhinav Bhatele

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The field of deep learning has witnessed a remarkable shift towards extremely compute- and memory-intensive neural networks. These newer larger models have enabled researchers to advance state-of-the-art tools across a variety of fields. This phenomenon has spurred the development of algorithms for distributed training of neural networks over a larger number of hardware accelerators. In this paper, we discuss and compare current state-of-the-art frameworks for large scale distributed deep learning. First, we survey current practices in distributed learning and identify the different types of parallelism used. Then, we present empirical results comparing their performance on large image and language training tasks. Additionally, we address their statistical efficiency and memory consumption behavior. Based on our results, we discuss algorithmic and implementation portions of each framework which hinder performance.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.DCDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2022 to Sep 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Although this seems to only affect the Chinese and Russian governments (as opposed to researchers), I'm generally against economic brinkmanship of this variety. It just festers resentment, and doesn't seem to achieve much: of what little I could find and scan in an hour, it…

      kvathupoView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.