<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Covariant formulation of Generalised Uncertainty Principle · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.15951/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.15951/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Covariant formulation of Generalised Uncertainty Principle — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31355525</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.15951:31355525</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 15:24:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to cause trouble, since we&amp;#x27;re straying far far from today&amp;#x27;s presentations (except arguably UCL&amp;#x27;s Z. Younsi in the ongoing ESO Q&amp;amp;A panel). :-) Can we write down the uncertainty principle in covariant form? Maybe! There is active theoretical work ongoing (e.g.) &amp;lt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15951v2&amp;gt; (&amp;quot;... a geometric formalism for the generalised uncertainty principle which is covariant and connects features of the underlying geometry with the deformation of canonical commutator relations ... [and] an elegant interpretation for the standard dispersion relation p^2=−m^2: it describes flat…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.15951/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
