HackerPapers

arXiv:2110.14168cs.LG

Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, John Schulman

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

State-of-the-art language models can match human performance on many tasks, but they still struggle to robustly perform multi-step mathematical reasoning. To diagnose the failures of current models and support research, we introduce GSM8K, a dataset of 8.5K high quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems. We find that even the largest transformer models fail to achieve high test performance, despite the conceptual simplicity of this problem distribution. To increase performance, we propose training verifiers to judge the correctness of model completions. At test time, we generate many candidate solutions and select the one ranked highest by the verifier. We demonstrate that verification significantly improves performance on GSM8K, and we provide strong empirical evidence that verification scales more effectively with increased data than a finetuning baseline.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2023 to Sep 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • During the big GPT-4 news cycle I think a bunch of folks posted claims that were outrageously good- "language model passes medical exams better than humans", etc. When I looked into them, in nearly all cases, the claims were boosted far beyond the reality. And the reality seemed…

      dekhnView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.