<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Metrics of research impact in astronomy: Predicting later impact from metrics measured 10-15 years after the PhD · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.14115/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.14115/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Metrics of research impact in astronomy: Predicting later impact from metrics measured 10-15 years after the PhD — mentioned by civilized</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29217231</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.14115:29217231</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:08:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;More detail on the Kormendy controversy: 1. Archive copy of withdrawn paper: https://web.archive.org/web/20211028230225/https:/arxiv.org/... 2. Coverage at Retraction Watch: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/11/03/astronomer-apologizes... &amp;quot;The book required 5 years of intense, essentially full-time work. I believe in it. But for now, all advice to me has been that it is dangerous and unwarranted even to defend the work. I therefore am unable to comment further on events. I am sorry — more than words can say.&amp;quot; -- Kormendy 3. Kormendy&amp;#x27;s Apology: https://chandra.as.utexas.edu/apology.html &amp;quot;I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.14115/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
