<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Formal Verification of the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.12909/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.12909/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Formal Verification of the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain — mentioned by capableweb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32013132</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.12909:32013132</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:27:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The implementations are also very close to formally verified if not fully formally verified. So is Eth2, see &amp;quot;Formal Verification of the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain&amp;quot; by Franck Cassez, Joanne Fuller, Aditya Asgaonkar, paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12909) and source code (https://github.com/ConsenSys/eth2.0-dafny). More efforts to formally verify Eth2 is ongoing as well, by different entities. &amp;gt; Nothing is perfect but cryptographic code has to be pretty bulletproof or a lot of systems would get owned Same with Ethereum. The chance of having a major impact with a vulnerability is even higher…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.12909/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item><item><title>Formal Verification of the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29010566</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2110.12909:29010566</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:43:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Formal Verification of the Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.12909/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
