<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tight Bounds on the Spooky Pebble Game: Recycling Qubits with Measurements · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.08973/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.08973/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tight Bounds on the Spooky Pebble Game: Recycling Qubits with Measurements — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34125264</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.08973:34125264</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:49:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve also had some interesting interactions between the academic world and my blog. One time someone copy pasted a bunch of my blog posts, ran them through a thesaurus badly, and published the result in trash journals under their own name. For example: [1] was turned into [2]. Even stranger was they apparently then machine generated a gibberish paper, referencing many of these badly plagiarized papers, and put my name and a coworker&amp;#x27;s name on it as authors [3]. Without our permission, obviously. Actually, that&amp;#x27;s what led me to the badly plagiarized papers. A different time, some researchers…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.08973/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
