<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SmashEx: Smashing SGX Enclaves Using Exceptions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.06657/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.06657/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SmashEx: Smashing SGX Enclaves Using Exceptions — mentioned by saagarjha</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33798179</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.06657:33798179</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:07:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re making an apple-to-oranges comparison between TEEs and SGX. The attacks on SGX here are on the processor/model of SGX itself. Buffer overflows are bugs in the applets that run inside the TEE. SGX applications can and do have similar bugs. Here&amp;#x27;s a random paper I found, there are many more: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.06657.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.06657/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SmashEx: Smashing SGX Enclaves Using Exceptions — mentioned by wmf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28952497</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2110.06657:28952497</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:29:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Days since SGX was hacked: 8 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06657&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2110.06657/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
