<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From internal models toward metacognitive AI · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.12798/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.12798/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From internal models toward metacognitive AI — mentioned by juliangamble</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28725149</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.12798:28725149</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:15:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Theory of Mind/Metacognition/Sense of Agency is well defined in the literature based on decades of research: https://aeon.co/essays/is-there-a-symmetry-between-metacogni... For the latest in consciousness research - look at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12798 Here (p14) they make artificial consciousness testable by making mental models of action, and the conscious &amp;#x27;thought&amp;#x27; is the difference between what the action that was expected vs the action that occurred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.12798/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.NC</category></item></channel></rss>
