<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Julia for Biologists · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09973/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09973/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Julia for Biologists — mentioned by ChrisRackauckas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29359138</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.09973:29359138</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:38:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not in real-world contexts. This is spelled out in Julia for Biologists (https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09973) which does the operation counting to show why using Numba with SciPy is still an order of magnitude slower in scientific operations like solving differential equations compared to Julia. An order of magnitude on widely used scientific analyses is pretty significant!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09973/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.QM</category></item><item><title>Julia for Biologists — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28668555</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2109.09973:28668555</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:01:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Julia for Biologists&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09973/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.QM</category></item></channel></rss>
