<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do Long-Range Language Models Actually Use Long-Range Context? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09115/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09115/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do Long-Range Language Models Actually Use Long-Range Context? — mentioned by skepticATX</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35502673</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.09115:35502673</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2023 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Can someone with a better understanding than I have comment about the relationship between these results and this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09115, which seems to demonstrate that a longer context length has diminishing returns?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.09115/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
