<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Characterization of the continuous transition from atomic to molecular shape in the three-body Coulomb system · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.04542/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.04542/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Characterization of the continuous transition from atomic to molecular shape in the three-body Coulomb system — mentioned by Xcelerate</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30792497</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.04542:30792497</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 16:56:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; if you actually do quantum chemistry I have—for my PhD dissertation I performed QMC calculations for lithium intercalation in carbon. Why do you assume I haven&amp;#x27;t? &amp;gt; as the structure of DNA is defined partly by its environment (the specific details of waters that are only weakly bound... Yes. Of course I&amp;#x27;ve done water box simulations. Should I elaborate on all the minutiae of molecular dynamics for the reader? Or am I allowed to make some simplifications? I&amp;#x27;ll be more precise: suppose we consider a strand of DNA and its immediate surrounding environment, and trace out the rest of the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.04542/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.chem-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
