<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deliberative Democracy with Dilutive Voting Power Sharing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.01436/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.01436/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deliberative Democracy with Dilutive Voting Power Sharing — mentioned by fuzzc0re</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33230831</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.01436:33230831</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:53:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I have been waiting for some time to find the right context on hackernews to shamelessly mention a democratic system that I have been working on for the last year: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.01436.pdf IMO the problem with most {something} democracy systems is that they are voting paradigms that focus either only or mostly on how decisions are made but not how the options to decide upon are formed. This is true for the systems that you mentioned as well. Moreover, the fact that decision-making and policy authoring are operations that take time leads to citizens&amp;#x27; beliefs updating during the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.01436/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>econ.TH</category></item></channel></rss>
