<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.00527/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.00527/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents — mentioned by gamegoblin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36615986</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2109.00527:36615986</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:06:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The benefit of &amp;quot;traditional&amp;quot; O(N^2) transformer attention is you correlate every token to every other token. So, in the limit, your network won&amp;#x27;t &amp;quot;miss&amp;quot; much. When you abandon O(N^2) attention, you are forced to start adding heuristics to choose what to correlate. Any time you see one of those giant context window LLMs, you need to be asking what heuristics they added, what is getting correlated, and what is not getting correlated. This paper chooses an exponential heuristic where tokens further in the past get exponentially less attention. This heuristic is fine for certain tasks like…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2109.00527/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
