<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Automorphic Bloch theorems for hyperbolic lattices · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.09314/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.09314/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Automorphic Bloch theorems for hyperbolic lattices — mentioned by eigenspace</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39960050</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2108.09314:39960050</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2024 11:21:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think of it like another basis too, but nowadays I think this basis analogy is a bit fraught, or at least not the whole story. In particular, for multidimensional spaces, the usual multidimensional Fourier transform only really works if you have a flat metric on that space (I.e. no curvature). That’s a bit of a warning signal given that our universe itself is curved. There was some very interesting work recently where it was shown how to generalize Fourier series to certain hyperbolic lattices [1], and one important outcome of that work is that the analog of the Fourier space is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.09314/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
