<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Happy MitM: Fun and Toys in Every Bluetooth Device · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.07190/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.07190/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Happy MitM: Fun and Toys in Every Bluetooth Device — mentioned by upofadown</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46456651</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2108.07190:46456651</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 18:31:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Regular Bluetooth security is not that great. A lot of it is poor usability where the user can&amp;#x27;t easily know that they don&amp;#x27;t have a secure connection. Setting up a secure connection might involve entering a PIN on each end of the connection which might be challenging for something like a pair of earbuds. This contains a nice discussion of the issues and talks about active attacks: * https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07190&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2108.07190/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
