HackerPapers

arXiv:2108.00275cond-mat.dis-nn

Demonstration of Decentralized, Physics-Driven Learning

Sam Dillavou, Menachem Stern, Andrea J. Liu, Douglas J. Durian

Abstract

In typical artificial neural networks, neurons adjust according to global calculations of a central processor, but in the brain neurons and synapses self-adjust based on local information. Contrastive learning algorithms have recently been proposed to train physical systems, such as fluidic, mechanical, or electrical networks, to perform machine learning tasks from local evolution rules. However, to date such systems have only been implemented in silico due to the engineering challenge of creating elements that autonomously evolve based on their own response to two sets of global boundary conditions. Here we introduce and implement a physics-driven contrastive learning scheme for a network of variable resistors, using circuitry to locally compare the response of two identical networks subjected to the two different sets of boundary conditions. Using this innovation, our system effectively trains itself, optimizing its resistance values without use of a central processor or external information storage. Once the system is trained for a specified allostery, regression, or classification task, the task is subsequently performed rapidly and automatically by the physical imperative to minimize power dissipation in response to the given voltage inputs. We demonstrate that, unlike typical computers, such learning systems are robust to extreme damage (and thus manufacturing defects) due to their decentralized learning. Our twin-network approach is therefore readily scalable to extremely large or nonlinear networks where its distributed nature will be an enormous advantage; a laboratory network of only 500 edges will already outpace its in silico counterpart.

arXiv comments
11 pages 7 figures
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.014040
Subjects
cond-mat.dis-nnDisordered Systems and Neural Networks cond-mat.softSoft Condensed Matter

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 1 thread, from Mar 2022 to Mar 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2022 to Jun 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I actually work on this project! Feel free to ask any questions. Also, here’s an arxiv link to one of the papers if anyone is interested: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00275

      RaisinLoaf69View on HNParent context

    • Link to arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00275

      mlajtosView on HNParent context

    • You are right of course that it shouldn't, but in practice it always is. The pragmatic reason for that is that if a team spends a month and a few thousand dollars developing and tuning a system, and then they find that the first time they test it on their held-out test set it…

      YeGoblynQueenneView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.