HackerPapers

arXiv:2107.10356cs.CV

Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Images

Imon Banerjee, Ananth Reddy Bhimireddy, John L. Burns, Leo Anthony Celi, Li-Ching Chen, Ramon Correa, Natalie Dullerud, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shih-Cheng Huang, Po-Chih Kuo, Matthew P Lungren, Lyle Palmer, Brandon J Price, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Ayis Pyrros, Luke Oakden-Rayner, Chima Okechukwu, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Hari Trivedi, Ryan Wang, Zachary Zaiman, Haoran Zhang, Judy W Gichoya

Abstract

Background: In medical imaging, prior studies have demonstrated disparate AI performance by race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to the human expert interpreting the images. Methods: Using private and public datasets we evaluate: A) performance quantification of deep learning models to detect race from medical images, including the ability of these models to generalize to external environments and across multiple imaging modalities, B) assessment of possible confounding anatomic and phenotype population features, such as disease distribution and body habitus as predictors of race, and C) investigation into the underlying mechanism by which AI models can recognize race. Findings: Standard deep learning models can be trained to predict race from medical images with high performance across multiple imaging modalities. Our findings hold under external validation conditions, as well as when models are optimized to perform clinically motivated tasks. We demonstrate this detection is not due to trivial proxies or imaging-related surrogate covariates for race, such as underlying disease distribution. Finally, we show that performance persists over all anatomical regions and frequency spectrum of the images suggesting that mitigation efforts will be challenging and demand further study. Interpretation: We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race -- even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images -- in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model has access to.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00063-2
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.CYComputers and Society eess.IVImage and Video Processing

On Hacker News

Linked by 5 identifiable commenters in 5 comments across 3 threads, from Aug 2021 to Dec 2021. Found in 2 HN submissions from Aug 2021 to Aug 2021. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • A conceptually related finding that computer vsion models can effectively classify patient race from significantly noised x-ray images https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10356 > However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race -- even from corrupted, cropped, and…

      kthejoker2View on HNParent context

    • It might be helpful for folks to look at the blog post written by one of the authors: https://lukeoakdenrayner.wordpress.com/2021/08/02/ai-has-the... or the paper itself https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.10356.pdf I see a lot of "oh it's probably just picking up on x y z" when x, y…

      hgialView on HNParent context

    • They always call for 'further investigation'. Looking at this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.10356.pdf My general impression (no more than that) is a whole bunch of people crowding into a paper. The paper is mostly applying trivial image processing functions and seeing how some…

      OneEyedRobotView on HNParent context

    • > they found it looks at the name of the patient on the border of the image or something similar. The images were anonymised. If they AI cheated, it’s not obvious how. The paper is interesting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10356

      lostloginView on HNParent context

    • Disclaimer: Worth noting that this paper is apparently pre-print [1] and was submitted to the Lancet, who are not particularly reliable in recent times (flaws hydroxychloroquine study [2], stamped out early investigation in COVID lab-leak possibility [3]). Regarding the blog and…

      bArrayView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.