<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Implications of Symmetry and Pressure in Friedmann Cosmology. I. Formalism · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.06643/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.06643/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Implications of Symmetry and Pressure in Friedmann Cosmology. I. Formalism — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34849439</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2107.06643:34849439</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 18:19:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s only current thinking in SYM/string/D-brane circles, surely? Strominger &amp;amp; Vafa (at the link) is explicitly about N=5 AdS_2 x S^3. Ok, nice that you get unitarity above all in that, but it&amp;#x27;s not at all clear that the picture corresponds with our universe. I do not see how it could possibly correspond with the universe of the linked article. Croker, Weiner et al. (the authors of the topic paper) are keen first and foremost on their spinning black hole interior solution, which is wholly classical and found at &amp;lt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06643&amp;gt;. In the more recent topic paper they argue…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.06643/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
