<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>You Really Shouldn't Roll Your Own Crypto: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Cryptographic Libraries · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.04940/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.04940/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>You Really Shouldn't Roll Your Own Crypto: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Cryptographic Libraries — mentioned by NotSwift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28040309</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2107.04940:28040309</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:01:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Cryptographic Libraries[0]: &amp;gt; Among our most interesting findings is that only 27.2% of &amp;gt; vulnerabilities in cryptographic libraries are cryptographic &amp;gt; issues while 37.2% of vulnerabilities are memory safety is- &amp;gt; sues, indicating that systems-level bugs are a greater secu- &amp;gt; rity concern than the actual cryptographic procedures. These libraries were developed by security experts and even they made some serious errors. [0]https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04940&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.04940/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>You Really Shouldn't Roll Your Own Crypto: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Cryptographic Libraries — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27947661</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2107.04940:27947661</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 08:28:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Cryptographic Libraries&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;108 points; 57 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2107.04940/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
