<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition — mentioned by jessa0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46846876</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.14851:46846876</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 15:34:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like this is a poisoning attack, which has been shown to be pretty trivially defeated [1]. That said, while poisoning countermeasures in the facial recognition case were shown to easily generalize, we dont know yet how general of a defense could be built for a VLM. Which means holding a 0day poisoning attack on a VLM could cause a lot of trouble / deaths before an update to the model with counter-training could be deployed.. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14851&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition — mentioned by simandl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35232482</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.14851:35232482</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:00:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Last year&amp;#x27;s ICLR had a paper, &amp;quot;Data Poisoning Won&amp;#x27;t Save You From Facial Recognition&amp;quot; that included the Glaze team&amp;#x27;s previous project, Fawkes. This statement from that paper is quite damning. &amp;quot;This paper shows that these systems (and, in fact, any poisoning strategy) cannot protect users’ privacy. Worse, we argue that these systems offer a false sense of security. There exists a class of privacy-conscious users who might have otherwise never uploaded their photos to the internet; however who now might do so, under the false belief that data poisoning will protect their privacy. These users…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition — mentioned by belter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27673644</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.14851:27673644</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:27:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.14851.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27673643</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2106.14851:27673643</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:27:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Data Poisoning Won&amp;#x27;t Save You from Facial Recognition&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.14851/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
