<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A CCCZ gate performed with 6 T gates · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.11513/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.11513/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A CCCZ gate performed with 6 T gates — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29615099</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.11513:29615099</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:18:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda of worry that if this site succeeded, it would slowly do to papers what news aggregators and the internet already did to news. Grind and incentivize them down into clickbait with no meat, with as few things as possible that people won&amp;#x27;t immediately understand. For example, looking over my own papers for examples, a one page note [1] got more scites than a paper I contributed to that introduced several techniques cumulatively dropping the projected cost of simulating a chemistry thing by more than a factor of a million [2]. That&amp;#x27;s a cherry picked example, the pattern isn&amp;#x27;t that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.11513/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
