<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>An enriched category theory of language: from syntax to semantics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07890/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07890/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>An enriched category theory of language: from syntax to semantics — mentioned by macrolocal</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29389462</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.07890:29389462</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:10:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s why it&amp;#x27;s so amazing that language models have gotten so far with just proximity statistics! Btw, this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07890 outlines a promising approach to mapping the semantics encoded in these models. Understanding their limits could make your rejection of Wittgenstein all the more precise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07890/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CT</category></item></channel></rss>
