<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Network · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07229/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07229/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Network — mentioned by mitchellpkt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34358258</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.07229:34358258</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 18:33:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Good questions. Hmm do you think maybe it would be viable if the payouts were based on [model] performance rather than ostensible training time? There&amp;#x27;s a useful asymmetry we can exploit: finding weights that perform well is computationally intensive and takes time, but scoring a set of weights is fast and easy. A number cruncher could spend 2 weeks training a model, and then when they submit the results it takes me 10 seconds to score the model - to verify the quality of the results, and calculate the performance-based payout. In the #1 or #3 scenario where they didn&amp;#x27;t do or didn&amp;#x27;t complete…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.07229/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
