<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sterile Neutrinos · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.05913/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.05913/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sterile Neutrinos — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37017174</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.05913:37017174</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 23:17:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I had missed that note by Milgrom. With JWST it seems we might be able to get closer to an answer[1]. Sterile neutrinos[2] seemed like an obvious candidate, but we&amp;#x27;ll see how that pans out. Current searches aren&amp;#x27;t positive[3][4], but I suppose it&amp;#x27;s far to early to call it quits on that given the theoretical motivation. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00030 [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05913 [3]: https://phys.org/news/2022-11-analysis-closer-sterile-neutri... [4]: https://phys.org/news/2023-01-results-stereo-sterile-neutrin...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.05913/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
