<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Making CNNs Interpretable by Building Dynamic Sequential Decision Forests with Top-down Hierarchy Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.02824/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.02824/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Making CNNs Interpretable by Building Dynamic Sequential Decision Forests with Top-down Hierarchy Learning — mentioned by nickpsecurity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43372214</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2106.02824:43372214</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:53:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That assumes it can even be done. It&amp;#x27;s worth looking into. There have been some projects in those areas. Mixing probabilistic logic with deep learning: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08485 https://github.com/ML-KULeuven/deepproblog Combining decision trees with neural nets for interpretability: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07553 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.02824v1 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.06988 https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2020/EECS-2020-... It looks like model transfer from uninterpretable, pretrained models to interpretable models is the best strategy to keep using. That also…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2106.02824/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
