<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Analysis for the Overwhelming Success of the Web Compared to Microcosm and Hyper-G Systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.08057/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.08057/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Analysis for the Overwhelming Success of the Web Compared to Microcosm and Hyper-G Systems — mentioned by rurban</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098467</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.08057:47098467</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 07:45:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not really. In Graz we had our better Hyper-G graphical browser before CERN, with a completely integrated system to ensure link consistency. Every browser was also the editor. In 1989. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.08057 At CERN they wanted to enrich gopher with multimedia data to share building plans and images of their complicated plans, in Graz we wanted to provide a rich teaching and information platform for students. Sadly we went commercial and not open source, so worse got better. Well, a session-less server as httpd was actually better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.08057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
