<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Web Content Signing with Service Workers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.05551/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.05551/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Web Content Signing with Service Workers — mentioned by littlestymaar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36478557</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.05551:36478557</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:57:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I suspect they want a browser feature to show fingerprints of the HTML and of subresources possibly to pin a certificate for a given domain. You can do pretty much all you want in a ServiceWorker today[1], but I&amp;#x27;ll advise against pinning certificates, because you&amp;#x27;d just be re-marking HPKP again, with the same gigantic footgun. &amp;gt; A browser setting to only load subresources with integrity checks would also help A “browser setting”? What&amp;#x27;s the point if the user need to set it up themselves to be secure? Some kind of linting tool on CI in order to be sure you never include a resource without…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.05551/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
