<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pareto-Optimal Quantized ResNet Is Mostly 4-bit · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03536/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03536/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pareto-Optimal Quantized ResNet Is Mostly 4-bit — mentioned by bippingchip</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35148832</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.03536:35148832</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:51:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is really interesting, thank you for the reference! Having worked more with images based NN than language models before, I wonder: are LLM inherently more suited to aggressive quantisation, due to their very large size? I see people suggesting here 4b is pretty good, and 3b should be the target. I remember ResNets etc can of course also be quantized, and up to 8-6b you get pretty good results with very little effort, with low-ish degradation in performance. Trying to go down to 4b is more challenging, though this paper claims with quantisation aware training 4b is possible indeed, but…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03536/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
