<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient training · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03404/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03404/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient training — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38464134</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.03404:38464134</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:35:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Also, we know that transformers can scale Do we have strong evidence that other models don&amp;#x27;t scale or have we just put more time into transformers? Convolutional resnets look to scale on vision and language: (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00808, (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00476, (nlp) https://github.com/HazyResearch/safari MLPs also seem to scale: (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01601, (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03404 I mean I don&amp;#x27;t see a strong reason to turn away from attention as well but I also don&amp;#x27;t think anyone&amp;#x27;s thrown a billion parameter MLP or Conv model at a problem.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.03404/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
