<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Remote Attestation: A Literature Review · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.02466/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.02466/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Remote Attestation: A Literature Review — mentioned by transpute</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640879</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.02466:40640879</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:22:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; What’s stopping remote endpoint always responding “yes” It requires a small, trusted remote observer hardware component, e.g. TCG TPM/DICE, Apple Secure Enclave, Google OpenTitan, Microsoft Pluton. 2021 literature review, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02466 2022 HN thread on remote attestation, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32282305&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.02466/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Remote Attestation: A Literature Review — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27085617</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2105.02466:27085617</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 10:05:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Remote Attestation [of untrusted remote devices]: A Literature Review (2020)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.02466/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
