<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision — mentioned by mattalex</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415526</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.01601:48415526</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:19:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Because the size of the attention matrix depends on the number of tokens (this is what makes attention N^2). If you don&amp;#x27;t care about having a flexible number of input tokens (e.g. in image processing) you can learn a fixed routing matrix. This is known as an MLP mixer https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.01601 : you have one layer that processes each token in isolation (&amp;quot;vertical MLP&amp;quot;) but ignores the inter-token connections, followed by a layer that combines between tokens (&amp;quot;horizontal MLP&amp;quot;) that treats the internals of every token identically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38464134</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.01601:38464134</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:35:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Also, we know that transformers can scale Do we have strong evidence that other models don&amp;#x27;t scale or have we just put more time into transformers? Convolutional resnets look to scale on vision and language: (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00808, (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00476, (nlp) https://github.com/HazyResearch/safari MLPs also seem to scale: (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01601, (cv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03404 I mean I don&amp;#x27;t see a strong reason to turn away from attention as well but I also don&amp;#x27;t think anyone&amp;#x27;s thrown a billion parameter MLP or Conv model at a problem.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28581570</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2105.01601:28581570</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 03:57:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;MLP-Mixer: An All-MLP Architecture for Vision&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;38 points; 16 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27092544</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2105.01601:27092544</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 02:08:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually... we&amp;#x27;re not sure! While it&amp;#x27;s true that Transformers work amazingly on more domains than they have any right to, it&amp;#x27;s unclear if they truly obsolete multi-layer perceptrons/fully-connected networks. You may have seen the recent splash of MLP-Mixer for image classification using perceptrons (https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01601#google) but FC-heavy or FC-only nets have popped up here and there, never quite going away, and slowly getting better initializations &amp;amp; residual layers making them ever more trainable. I have a bibliography of some links I&amp;#x27;ve noted over the years about them…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Vision — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27050794</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2105.01601:27050794</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 15:05:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;MLP-Mixer: An All-MLP Architecture for Vision&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2105.01601/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
