<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Key · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.10788/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.10788/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Key — mentioned by k310</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47290684</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2104.10788:47290684</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 19:30:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I hereby propose, in addition, banning toxic social media for over-16&amp;#x27;s, the people who can do the most damage to themselves, society and their under-16 kids. How do we define toxicity? There are studies that can be made into algorithms. Only non-toxic sites like Hacker News will be available to those either over 16 or under 16, inclusively. Defining and detecting toxicity on social media: context and knowledge are key [0] &amp;gt; Abstract Online platforms have become an increasingly prominent means of communication. Despite the obvious benefits to the expanded distribution of content, the last…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.10788/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
