<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.05704/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.05704/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44665707</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2104.05704:44665707</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:54:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I didn&amp;#x27;t find too much value in this paper. I think it is good as a product demonstration, I just don&amp;#x27;t know if it added a ton of value into the research space (but maybe it did because people have been making the same mistake for awhile?). I actually think the linked page makes it very easy to understand my main critique. The main problem here is that downscaling is a destructive process. It destroys information. Zoom in on that sign, can you read it?[0] No! But can you in the high res?[1] Of course! We can of course train the model on those signs alone and then get it to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.05704/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers — mentioned by stevenwalton</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38495851</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2104.05704:38495851</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 04:24:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Logged into my personal account for this one! I&amp;#x27;m a lead author on a paper that explored exactly. It does enable faster training and smaller model sizes. For reference, you can get 80% accuracy on CIFAR-10 in ~30 minutes of CPU (not using crazy optimizations). There are open questions about scaling but at the time we did not have access to big compute (really still don&amp;#x27;t) and our goals were focused on addressing the original ViT&amp;#x27;s claims of data constraints and necessities of pretraining for smaller datasets (spoiler, augmentation + overlapping patches plays a huge role). Basically we wanted…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.05704/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers — mentioned by tourist_on_road</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30632160</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2104.05704:30632160</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:41:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point. The fact there is no inductive bias inherent to transformers makes it difficult to train a decent model on small datasets from scratch. However, there are recent research directions that try to address this problem [1]. Also baking in some sort of domain specific inductive bias into model architecture itself can address this problem as well [2]. [1]: Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05704 [2]: CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15808&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2104.05704/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
